
Organization is the Key for Selecting Software Vendors
Larry Fortin | February 12, 2014
An inside look at how one insurance IT manager goes about the difficult task of keeping existing systems humming while searching for new software solutions.
By Larry Fortin
For many of us the idea of going through a vendor selection process can be a daunting task. The day to day task of running an IT department has its own schedule with staff meetings, working with business management, and keeping the systems available for the general corporate workforce are enough to challenge a typical workday to say nothing about adding a strategic initiative on top of everything else. However, like most things in the IT management process, you have the task of getting it done.
My goal with this article is to bring some process and methodology to the task for IT managers who may not have been through the process before, or for tried and true managers that may want to reaffirm their practice. For a significant vendor selection process, such as searching for a claim, policy, or billing system, plan for six to eight months to do it properly.
The first set of tasks is to establish a vendor selection committee. In our organization, this is usually comprised of a business sponsor, a member or two from their department, other business stakeholders, and IT resources. From this group, we select a subcommittee that will follow the vendor selection process through the selection of three vendors. The full committee is then responsible for the final vendor selected.
The selection process begins with determining what your requirements are. Without solid requirements generated from business stakeholders, the rest of the progression will be in vein. This step in the process may be more challenging than originally anticipated as stakeholders may not agree on what the requirements should be. However, getting the stakeholders on the same page is critical and fundamental to the success of the vendor selection and the final system implementation.
My preferred method for documenting high-level requirements in the vendor selection process is using Excel with the requirements in the first column, and assigning a relative point factor to the requirement in the second column. The relative point factor is the importance placed on the requirement as it relates to the organization. As an organization, we recently went through a vendor selection process for a Claims System. Figure 1: Example Requirements and Point Assignment provides two examples. First, an example of what is meant by high-level business requirements for a claims system, and second what the relative point factors are for each requirement.
The requirements shown in Figure 1 are business-related requirements. The requirement gathering step should also take into consideration technical, financial, implementation risk, and contractual requirements. In our claims system example, we provided technical requirements where the system must be written in .Net and support the use of SQL server. The financial requirements were around company size (revenue), number of employees (onshore, offshore, near shore) with the proper skill set, and contract requirements (fixed vs. time and material). Lastly, we included factors that would reduce implementation risk (experience, unofficial references, and key vendor employees).
Now that a list of high-level requirements are in place with business representatives in agreement as to the relative priority to the organization, the focus can shift to generating a list of potential vendors. For a claims, or policy system, our goal was to identify 12-15 potential vendors. To generate a list of potential vendors, reach out to your personal network of industry IT managers, insurance and technology conferences, research analysts, and trusted consultants.
Leveraging Social Networks
There are several social networks that you can leverage. I belong to a couple of IT management LinkedIn groups that are specifically focused on the insurance industry. Following a couple of groups will allow you to post questions about potential vendors as well as interact with individuals that have specific experience with different products. The new Insurance Technology Association (ITA) group provides a forum for IT managers to interact.
Another source of generating potential vendors is insurance industry conferences. There are NAMIC (National Association Mutual Insurance Companies), ACORD / LOMA, IASA, and RIMS (Risk Management Society) in addition to other reputable conferences.
I rely heavily on research analysts for potential vendors. Analyst groups spend a great deal of time interacting with vendors and writing reports about various aspects of the vendor community such as technology platforms, maturity, sales in the last year, size, etc. Unless you are a client of one of the research analysts, the reports will cost an appropriate amount. Given that you are likely to spend, at a minimum, several hundred thousand dollars, the cost of one of these reports is minimal. The research analysts that I’m familiar with and interact with on a regular basis are Novarica and Strategy Meets Action. Additional sources are Gartner, Celent, and Forrester Research.
Fill in the Names
When you have identified the 12-15 potential vendors and requirements, go back to your spreadsheet and fill in the names of the companies across the top as shown in Figure 3: Vendor List (the names of the vendors have been grayed out). I also created a Hyperlink of the company names that are linked to another tab within the spreadsheet (Vendor Contact Tab). This provides a place to keep all contact information and dates of communication. At the bottom of the Vendor list tab, create a summation of each vendor’s columns so the points become totaled as you move forward and as shown in Figure 2: Vendor Point Summation.
The next step in the process is to issue an RFI (Request for Information) or RFP (Request for Proposal). My personal approach is to issue an RFI and then follow the steps I’ve outlined below. As part of the RFI, I ask for a typical license fee and professional services fee for a company our size. The sections within the RFI need to contain what your business and technical requirements are and the vendor’s corporate information. Be clear that you are using a point weighted system and the vendors need to provide clear answers and any gray area will get marked as zero points.
Most vendors are good at providing answers that help the process. Good partner-based vendors understand that they don’t want to waste your time as well as theirs and will provide concise answers. Send the RFI request to the contacts at the various vendors with a date you need a response by. When the RFIs come back, review the answers and enter the points into the spreadsheet as shown in Figure 3: Vendor list.
Manage the Communication
At this point in the process, there is likely to be a lot of information being communicated between you and the vendors. To manage this step I like to use Microsoft Notes. It is easy to set up and is nicely integrated with Microsoft Outlook. This approach provides for multiple ways to store and search for your vendor information and communication.
Once you have the RFIs back and all the information entered into the spreadsheet, you now have an objective view into which companies you should look into further. My approach has been to take the top five companies based on their total point values. Each time I’ve used this methodology, I’m surprised by which companies make it to the list of five.
The next step in the process is to get a feel for the top five vendors and their systems. You and your subcommittee have seen all the literature and probably have talked at length with respective vendor sales representatives. The approach I like to use is to schedule an on-line corporate presentation and demo for each of the five organizations with your subcommittee.
The agenda is for the vendor to go through their corporate presentation about who they are, how long they have been in business and their value proposition. One of the most important goals within this step of the process is to have the demo of the vendor’s system cover the high-level requirements. This will help clear up any miscommunication or misunderstandings about what you were looking for in a system and vendor organization. Adjust the spreadsheet numbers if needed and if there has been significant miss communication, take the vendor out of the mix and bring your number six vendor into the mix.
Narrow the Focus
At this time, you and your subcommittee have seen a good mix of vendor presentations and demos and the point assignments have been adjusted as needed. It is now time to select the top three vendor candidates and shift the process to the full committee. The selection of the top three vendors is as simple as reviewing which three vendors have the highest number of points. The subcommittee should present to the full committee the list of five companies and the details behind the points for the top three vendors and the reasons for cutting two from the list.
The next step in the process is to reduce the vendor list from three to two. This is done by bringing in the three vendors to present to the full selection committee. Some small subtle things that help in this step of the process are to schedule the three vendor’s presentations in the same week and when each full committee member can be present. I also like to provide a version of the selection spreadsheet to each committee member so they can see the individual requirements, and information gathered to date.
The allotted time for the presentations should be three to four hours. The vendors may invite you to dinner the night before the presentation and ask for some coaching. This is a great opportunity to get to know the key resources within the vendor organization. The fact the vendor is asking for coaching is a sign that a vendor is likely to want to work with you in the implementation. Ask the subcommittee to keep lots of notes through the vendor onsite presentations and demos.
At the end of each presentation, ask for a short debrief time with the full committee. While the presentation is fresh in everyone’s mind, ask and document the pros and cons of the vendor. Ask the full committee to rank the order of preference of the vendors that have presented to date. Go back to the point assessment spreadsheet and adjust as needed. Keep clear records of this information because it should be part of the official selection document you prepare. You may rely on it heavily in the future if you need to defend your process (i.e. new corporate management, board of directors, litigation process). The points should reflect the general consensus of the full committee’s choice of the top two vendors.
Final Choice
Undoubtedly the full committee will have questions about the two remaining vendors that surfaced as part the presentations and system demos. The final two vendors should be brought in for a second round of discussions where answers to questions from the first round can be discussed. It is important each of the vendors brings in members of their proposed implementation team (project manager and architect) if they didn’t during the first round of presentations and demos. Feel free to heavily question the vendor’s implementation team members. These are the resources you are going to be working with for a lengthy period of time. Also ask for and review resumes of the proposed team members.
It is important to have the final two vendor meetings in close proximity date wise to keep all the information fresh for committee members. Likewise, get the full committee together shortly after the two meetings and make the final decision on who the primary selected vendor is.
The final step in the process is to get a detailed proposal and contracts from the final two vendors. I’ve been clear to each vendor who is the primary recommended vendor and the secondary vendor. Through the contract analysis, you should feel confident in your primary recommendation, if not, or if something breaks downs in the negotiation process, you have the secondary vendor to fall back on.
As the IT Manager or leader in this process, I’ve always written up the official selection document. This document includes the process you went through, who the vendors were, and why the primary vendor was selected. It is also just as important to document why certain vendors were not selected.
Lessons Learned
Some of the lessons I’ve learned throughout the years with this process is to make sure you have your stakeholders identified and involved in the process. Be sure to communicate the process to your stakeholders before you begin. The vendor community will naturally gravitate to demoing what shows well with their systems; be sure to communicate that you also want to see how their system addresses your specific requirements.
As one of the corporate leaders, be sure that you understand your company’s short-term and long-term goals and objectives and take both into account when searching for the right vendor. And finally, when it comes to contracts make sure that license agreements and professional services agreements are tied together if the vendor is going to provide both services; this will help in future litigation if you were to have implementation issues. For most contract reviews, I leverage a law group that specializes in software-based contracts (Marzouk & Parry, Washington, D.C.).
The vendor selection process is meant to act like a funnel where a significant number of vendors are brought into the process at the beginning and through a series of conscious steps, one primary and one secondary vendor comes out the end. This roadmap is an unbiased, collaborative, requirement-weighted approach that will yield vendors that best meet your objectives and requirements. Good luck with the process and may all your future strategic implementations be successful.
(Larry Fortin is CIO of Millers Mutual Insurance and a member of the Insurance Technology Association advisory board.)
An inside look at how one insurance IT manager goes about the difficult task of keeping existing systems humming while searching for new software solutions.
By Larry Fortin
For many of us the idea of going through a vendor selection process can be a daunting task. The day to day task of running an IT department has its own schedule with staff meetings, working with business management, and keeping the systems available for the general corporate workforce are enough to challenge a typical workday to say nothing about adding a strategic initiative on top of everything else. However, like most things in the IT management process, you have the task of getting it done.
My goal with this article is to bring some process and methodology to the task for IT managers who may not have been through the process before, or for tried and true managers that may want to reaffirm their practice. For a significant vendor selection process, such as searching for a claim, policy, or billing system, plan for six to eight months to do it properly.
The first set of tasks is to establish a vendor selection committee. In our organization, this is usually comprised of a business sponsor, a member or two from their department, other business stakeholders, and IT resources. From this group, we select a subcommittee that will follow the vendor selection process through the selection of three vendors. The full committee is then responsible for the final vendor selected.
The selection process begins with determining what your requirements are. Without solid requirements generated from business stakeholders, the rest of the progression will be in vein. This step in the process may be more challenging than originally anticipated as stakeholders may not agree on what the requirements should be. However, getting the stakeholders on the same page is critical and fundamental to the success of the vendor selection and the final system implementation.
My preferred method for documenting high-level requirements in the vendor selection process is using Excel with the requirements in the first column, and assigning a relative point factor to the requirement in the second column. The relative point factor is the importance placed on the requirement as it relates to the organization. As an organization, we recently went through a vendor selection process for a Claims System. Figure 1: Example Requirements and Point Assignment provides two examples. First, an example of what is meant by high-level business requirements for a claims system, and second what the relative point factors are for each requirement.
The requirements shown in Figure 1 are business-related requirements. The requirement gathering step should also take into consideration technical, financial, implementation risk, and contractual requirements. In our claims system example, we provided technical requirements where the system must be written in .Net and support the use of SQL server. The financial requirements were around company size (revenue), number of employees (onshore, offshore, near shore) with the proper skill set, and contract requirements (fixed vs. time and material). Lastly, we included factors that would reduce implementation risk (experience, unofficial references, and key vendor employees).
Now that a list of high-level requirements are in place with business representatives in agreement as to the relative priority to the organization, the focus can shift to generating a list of potential vendors. For a claims, or policy system, our goal was to identify 12-15 potential vendors. To generate a list of potential vendors, reach out to your personal network of industry IT managers, insurance and technology conferences, research analysts, and trusted consultants.
Leveraging Social Networks
There are several social networks that you can leverage. I belong to a couple of IT management LinkedIn groups that are specifically focused on the insurance industry. Following a couple of groups will allow you to post questions about potential vendors as well as interact with individuals that have specific experience with different products. The new Insurance Technology Association (ITA) group provides a forum for IT managers to interact.
Another source of generating potential vendors is insurance industry conferences. There are NAMIC (National Association Mutual Insurance Companies), ACORD / LOMA, IASA, and RIMS (Risk Management Society) in addition to other reputable conferences.
I rely heavily on research analysts for potential vendors. Analyst groups spend a great deal of time interacting with vendors and writing reports about various aspects of the vendor community such as technology platforms, maturity, sales in the last year, size, etc. Unless you are a client of one of the research analysts, the reports will cost an appropriate amount. Given that you are likely to spend, at a minimum, several hundred thousand dollars, the cost of one of these reports is minimal. The research analysts that I’m familiar with and interact with on a regular basis are Novarica and Strategy Meets Action. Additional sources are Gartner, Celent, and Forrester Research.
Fill in the Names
When you have identified the 12-15 potential vendors and requirements, go back to your spreadsheet and fill in the names of the companies across the top as shown in Figure 3: Vendor List (the names of the vendors have been grayed out). I also created a Hyperlink of the company names that are linked to another tab within the spreadsheet (Vendor Contact Tab). This provides a place to keep all contact information and dates of communication. At the bottom of the Vendor list tab, create a summation of each vendor’s columns so the points become totaled as you move forward and as shown in Figure 2: Vendor Point Summation.
The next step in the process is to issue an RFI (Request for Information) or RFP (Request for Proposal). My personal approach is to issue an RFI and then follow the steps I’ve outlined below. As part of the RFI, I ask for a typical license fee and professional services fee for a company our size. The sections within the RFI need to contain what your business and technical requirements are and the vendor’s corporate information. Be clear that you are using a point weighted system and the vendors need to provide clear answers and any gray area will get marked as zero points.
Most vendors are good at providing answers that help the process. Good partner-based vendors understand that they don’t want to waste your time as well as theirs and will provide concise answers. Send the RFI request to the contacts at the various vendors with a date you need a response by. When the RFIs come back, review the answers and enter the points into the spreadsheet as shown in Figure 3: Vendor list.
Manage the Communication
At this point in the process, there is likely to be a lot of information being communicated between you and the vendors. To manage this step I like to use Microsoft Notes. It is easy to set up and is nicely integrated with Microsoft Outlook. This approach provides for multiple ways to store and search for your vendor information and communication.
Once you have the RFIs back and all the information entered into the spreadsheet, you now have an objective view into which companies you should look into further. My approach has been to take the top five companies based on their total point values. Each time I’ve used this methodology, I’m surprised by which companies make it to the list of five.
The next step in the process is to get a feel for the top five vendors and their systems. You and your subcommittee have seen all the literature and probably have talked at length with respective vendor sales representatives. The approach I like to use is to schedule an on-line corporate presentation and demo for each of the five organizations with your subcommittee.
The agenda is for the vendor to go through their corporate presentation about who they are, how long they have been in business and their value proposition. One of the most important goals within this step of the process is to have the demo of the vendor’s system cover the high-level requirements. This will help clear up any miscommunication or misunderstandings about what you were looking for in a system and vendor organization. Adjust the spreadsheet numbers if needed and if there has been significant miss communication, take the vendor out of the mix and bring your number six vendor into the mix.
Narrow the Focus
At this time, you and your subcommittee have seen a good mix of vendor presentations and demos and the point assignments have been adjusted as needed. It is now time to select the top three vendor candidates and shift the process to the full committee. The selection of the top three vendors is as simple as reviewing which three vendors have the highest number of points. The subcommittee should present to the full committee the list of five companies and the details behind the points for the top three vendors and the reasons for cutting two from the list.
The next step in the process is to reduce the vendor list from three to two. This is done by bringing in the three vendors to present to the full selection committee. Some small subtle things that help in this step of the process are to schedule the three vendor’s presentations in the same week and when each full committee member can be present. I also like to provide a version of the selection spreadsheet to each committee member so they can see the individual requirements, and information gathered to date.
The allotted time for the presentations should be three to four hours. The vendors may invite you to dinner the night before the presentation and ask for some coaching. This is a great opportunity to get to know the key resources within the vendor organization. The fact the vendor is asking for coaching is a sign that a vendor is likely to want to work with you in the implementation. Ask the subcommittee to keep lots of notes through the vendor onsite presentations and demos.
At the end of each presentation, ask for a short debrief time with the full committee. While the presentation is fresh in everyone’s mind, ask and document the pros and cons of the vendor. Ask the full committee to rank the order of preference of the vendors that have presented to date. Go back to the point assessment spreadsheet and adjust as needed. Keep clear records of this information because it should be part of the official selection document you prepare. You may rely on it heavily in the future if you need to defend your process (i.e. new corporate management, board of directors, litigation process). The points should reflect the general consensus of the full committee’s choice of the top two vendors.
Final Choice
Undoubtedly the full committee will have questions about the two remaining vendors that surfaced as part the presentations and system demos. The final two vendors should be brought in for a second round of discussions where answers to questions from the first round can be discussed. It is important each of the vendors brings in members of their proposed implementation team (project manager and architect) if they didn’t during the first round of presentations and demos. Feel free to heavily question the vendor’s implementation team members. These are the resources you are going to be working with for a lengthy period of time. Also ask for and review resumes of the proposed team members.
It is important to have the final two vendor meetings in close proximity date wise to keep all the information fresh for committee members. Likewise, get the full committee together shortly after the two meetings and make the final decision on who the primary selected vendor is.
The final step in the process is to get a detailed proposal and contracts from the final two vendors. I’ve been clear to each vendor who is the primary recommended vendor and the secondary vendor. Through the contract analysis, you should feel confident in your primary recommendation, if not, or if something breaks downs in the negotiation process, you have the secondary vendor to fall back on.
As the IT Manager or leader in this process, I’ve always written up the official selection document. This document includes the process you went through, who the vendors were, and why the primary vendor was selected. It is also just as important to document why certain vendors were not selected.
Lessons Learned
Some of the lessons I’ve learned throughout the years with this process is to make sure you have your stakeholders identified and involved in the process. Be sure to communicate the process to your stakeholders before you begin. The vendor community will naturally gravitate to demoing what shows well with their systems; be sure to communicate that you also want to see how their system addresses your specific requirements.
As one of the corporate leaders, be sure that you understand your company’s short-term and long-term goals and objectives and take both into account when searching for the right vendor. And finally, when it comes to contracts make sure that license agreements and professional services agreements are tied together if the vendor is going to provide both services; this will help in future litigation if you were to have implementation issues. For most contract reviews, I leverage a law group that specializes in software-based contracts (Marzouk & Parry, Washington, D.C.).
The vendor selection process is meant to act like a funnel where a significant number of vendors are brought into the process at the beginning and through a series of conscious steps, one primary and one secondary vendor comes out the end. This roadmap is an unbiased, collaborative, requirement-weighted approach that will yield vendors that best meet your objectives and requirements. Good luck with the process and may all your future strategic implementations be successful.
(Larry Fortin is CIO of Millers Mutual Insurance and a member of the Insurance Technology Association advisory board.)
Featured articles
- COVID Drives More Reliance on Risk Management Systems, New Study Finds
- Electronic Chat with Robert Clark, CEO, Cloverleaf Analytics
- Solving Customer Communications Challenges with Hybrid Mail
- Six Trends Shaping Digital Insurance Tech Strategies in 2021
- Billing a Key Component of Customer Service, Celent Finds
- Why Data Science Fails
- Electronic Chat with Andrew Jernigan, CEO, and Allen Koski, President and Chief Innovation Officer, Insured Nomads
- Electronic Chat with Allison Martin, CEO and Founder, UDoTest
- Are Carriers Ready for the Coming Crash?
- Electronic Chat with Christopher Moore, Director for North American Sales Engineering and Solutions, Trifacta
- Next Insurance Partners with Amazon Business Prime to Provide Small Businesses with Affordable Digital Insurance Options
- An AI Walks Into an Electronics Store...
- InsurTech NY Announces Global Early-Stage Competition Winners
- World’s Worst County/Western Insurtech Song
- Electronic Chat with Anne-Laure Klein, COO, Akur8
- COVID-19 One Year Later: The Digital Transformation of Insurance
- Electronic Chat with Michael Kassing, CEO/CVO, insured.io
- BrokerTech Ventures Announces 2021 Cohort Class for Accelerator
- An Entirely Preventable Disaster
- Flipping the Fraud Triangle
- The January/February ITA Pro Magazine is here!
- Credit Risk, ESG, Cybersecurity Top Risk Concerns for Financial Institutions, Deloitte Finds
- Electronic Chat with Ellen Moser, Senior Client Executive, Origami Risk LLC
- The Answer to “So What?”
- Leaders Rise from a Year Like No Other!
- Electronic Chat with Jonathan Roomer, Co-Founder, YuLife
- Getting Creative to Hit COVID Curveballs Out of the Park
- Electronic Chat with Eugenio Gonzalez, Plug and Play
- New Report Projects Global Insurtech to Grow by $21 Billion During 2020-2024
- The 2020 Virtual Event Wasteland
- Insurtechs, Investors Optimistic About Post-COVID Future, New DIA/McKinsey Study Finds
- Finding Grandmas
- No Code / Low Code: The New “Shortest Route” In Insurance Delivery
- Are You Addicted to Copy-and-Paste?
- Electronic Chat with Nino Tarantino, CEO- Americas, Insurance and Mobility Solutions (IMS)
- Driving Life Insurance:Tech Alone Won’t Solve Business Problems
- Electronic Chat with Robin Roberson, Managing Director, North America, Claim Central Consolidated
- How Do You Make It Happen?
- Electronic Chat with Jason Liu, CEO, Zywave
- New Partnership Models Take Program Business to the Next Level
- New Study Finds Less than Half of Consumers Trust Insurers to Respond to Their Needs
- Electronic Chat with Andrew Mauritzen, CFO and Head of Insurance Industry, Exactuals
- You Want Us To Do WHAT For Free?
- Electronic Chat with Evgeny Aleksandrov, Co-founder and CEO, Pilotbird
- Electronic Chat with Chris Cheatham, CEO, RiskGenius
- New MIT Sloan Study Finds Few Companies Gain Big Benefits from AI
- The September/October ITA Pro magazine is here!
- “Being Right” is Just the Start of the Battle
- Electronic Chat with Amit Ranjan, Executive VP and CAO, Xceedance
- Planning for Your Business and Tech Future: Strategies, Plans and Budgets for Rapid Transformation
- Electronic Chat with Jimmy Padia, Founder and CEO, Floatbot
- Gelato with Dots and Sprinkles
- COVID-19 and the Insurtech “Junk Drawer”
- Even “Change” is Different Now. Your Strategic Planning Needs to Be Too.
- The Road Ahead for P&C Insurers: How to Understand Customers Better and Navigate the Post-COVID Insurance Market
- Electronic Chat with Jake Tamarkin, Co-founder and CEO, Everyday Life
- Strategic Planning in the “New Normal” Digital Era of Insurance – Your Next Move
- Insurer Tech Investment Priorities See Major Shift in a Post-COVID World
- Plug and Play Selects 25 Insurtech Startups for Winter Batches
- Digital Transformation – A Top Strategic Priority and New Reality
- Four Steps to Successful Migration of Insurance CCM Applications
- COVID-19 Accelerates Insurance Digitalization to Meet Customer Demand: World InsurTech Report 2020
- Electronic Chat with Greg Williams, Co-Founder, President & CEO, Acrisure
- Electronic Chat with Matt Perlman, Partner, IA Capital Group
- Insurer Digitalization: Are you a Competitor or a Laggard?
- Leaders are Leading and Creating the Future of Insurance Distribution
- 3 Things You Need to Know About No-Code
- Electronic Chat with Adam Kiefer, CEO, Talage
- Underwriting in 3D: Using Data to Adapt and Improve Life Insurance Sales
- Getting Past the "Gelato Syndrome"
- Insurers Know CX/UX is Important, but Don't Agree on Execution, Study Finds
- Electronic Chat with Steve Lekas, Branch Insurance
- How AI Can Attract Millennial Talent to the Insurance Industry
- Preventing Data Breaches
- A New Boom for Life Insurance: Shifting Away from the 250-Year-Old Policy Transaction
- Electronic Chat with Ty Harris, Founder and CEO, Openly
- A Digital Wildfire Creates a Burning Platform for Digital Insurance Business Transformation
- Digitalization, COVID-19 Spurring More IT Investment in Cybersecurity
- Electronic Chat with Michael DeGusta, CEO, ClarionDoor
- U.S. Consumers Significantly Underestimate Flood Risk, New Survey Finds
- The Future of Insurance: Opportunities in Ecosystems
- Electronic Chat with Todd Greenbaum, CEO, Input 1
- Majesco to be Acquired by Thoma Bravo
- The Evolving Role of Managing General Agencies
- Electronic Chat with Char Hu
- Electronic Chat with Allan L. Egbert, Jr.
- Electronic Chat with Christopher Tramontano and Zbigniew Gawienczuk
- Data Science is Gelato
- Insurance Innovation: Alive and Kicking
- Independent Agents Divided on Digital Experience, New Survey Finds
- Electronic Chat with Michael Jones
- Electronic Chat with Paul VanderMarck
- As Auto Insurance Premiums Shrink, Insurers Need Mobility Ecosystem, New Study Finds
- Property & Casualty Insurers Raise Digital Games as COVID-19 Elevates Customer Expectations, J.D. Power Finds
- Electronic Chat with Bobbie Shrivastav
- Meet the Board: Marissa Buckley
- Big Data and Insurtech: A Carrier Perspective
- Traditional Insurers Need Open Ecosystems, Partnerships to Remain Competitive, CapGemini Report Finds
- Electronic Chat with John C. Siegman
- 4 Ways AI is Empowering Insurers During COVID-19
- 6 Big Changes to Insurance from the COVID-19 Crisis
- Electronic Chat with Christopher Ewing
- Independent Agency Staff Morale High During COVID-19, New Survey Finds
- Electronic Chat with Brad Epker
- Tapping AI to Improve Policyholder Experience
- Electronic Chat with Manisha Bhargava
- ITA Pro Magazine, March/April 2020
- COVID-19 a Game Changer for Workers’ Comp
- Electronic Chat with Steve Comer
- COVID-19 Pandemic Forces Cancellation of ITA LIVE 2020
- Leveraging Digital Resources in the Time of COVID-19
- Electronic Chat with Robert Hartwig on COVID-19 and Insurance
- Celent Study: Most Small Businesses Still Unclear on Importance of Cyber Insurance
- The January/February 2020 ITA Pro is here!
- Deloitte: New C-Suite Roles Mean More Opportunities for Women
- Electronic Chat with Pankaj Parashar
- Electronic Chat with Tara Kelly
- Electronic Chat with Chuck Wilson
- ITA, InsNerds Collaborate to Enhance ITA LIVE 2020 Content and Coverage
- How SMBs Can Compete in Digital Ecosystems in the 2020s
- 4 Ways Insurance Can Prepare for New Data Privacy Laws
- Brewer Lane Ventures Launches and Hires Insurtech Vet Martha Notaras as Managing Partner
- 2020 GIA Cohort Launches on January 14
- The November/December 2019 ITA Pro is here!
- Electronic Chat with Joshua Snead
- Electronic Chat with Wendy Aarons-Corman
- Simplifying the Move to a Third-party Print Provider
- Take a Business-Driven Approach to Continuous Improvement for Core Systems and Processes
- Electronic Chat with Ron Glozman
- Guidewire’s Data Guru Mike Byam on How Insurers are Using Internal and Third-Party Data
- Electronic Chat with Russ Bostick
- Electronic Chat with Rock Schindler
- Electronic Chat with John Siegman
- Electronic Chat with Martin Burlingame
- Insurtech Landscape 2019: Top 5 Takeaways
- Grinnell Mutual Tackles Massive Transformation -- in Stride
- A Candid Conversation with Paul Mang
- SageSure Insurance Managers Improved Competitiveness by Consolidating Payments to a Single Digital Platform
- Digital Does Matter in Insurance-- And Insurers are Missing the Mark
- The 22nd-Century Insurer: Taking a Cloud-First IT Approach
- The September/October 2019 issue of ITA PRO magazine is now available in digital format here:
- ITA Pro Magazine May/June 2019
- Spotlight on the 2019 IASA Conference
- ValueMomentum Selects Erie as Site of Regional Development Center
- Capgemini and Majesco Become Alliance Partners
- Electronic Chat with Dr. Dan Shoham
- Electronic Chat with Todd Greenbaum
- Martha Notaras: The “Outsider” with an Amazing Inside View
- Electronic Chat with Larissa Tosch
- Martha Notaras Will Join ITA LIVE 2019 as a Keynote Speaker
- Five Things to Consider When Evaluating Your Cyber Risk
- ITA Pro Magazine, January/February 2019
- Synergy Between Insurers' IT and Analytics Teams Key to Operationalizing Insights, Says Novarica
- Major Ransomware Attack Could Hit U.S. with $89B In Economic Damages
- ITA Announces 1st of Three Keynote Speakers at ITA LIVE 2019
- Electronic Chat with Jeroen Morrenhof
- Legacy Systems Are Dead. Really? Don't Count On It.
- Now Accepting Nominations for the 2019 ITA Bridge Awards
- It's time to register for ITA LIVE!
- Registration is Now Open for ITA LIVE 2019!
- What to Expect from a Digital Experience Platform Implementation
- ITA Pro Magazine September Edition is Now Available
- It's National IT Professionals Day
- Save the Date for ITA-LIVE 2019
- OneShield Software and UrbanStat Work Together to Improve Real-Time Analytics and Risk Decision-Making
- ITA LIVE 2019 - SAVE THE DATE!
- Insurance Technology Association Announces New Editor-in-Chief
- August 2018 Edition ITA Pro Magazine is Now Available
- Enterprise Architecture in an Agile World
- Top 10 Tips for Securing Your Mobile Devices and Sensitive Client Data
- Industry Insight: 4 Global Insurance Trends in Digital, Data, Content Services and Security
- Diving Deeper into Prioritizing Your Strategic Digital investments
- Why Content Rules
- How Mass Personalization Will Open the Small Business Benefits Market
- At Year End 2017, Will Your Organization Be Protected from Cyber Risks?
- Do Insurance Bots Dream of Mitigating Risk?
- Conditioned to Respond
- Managing & Mobilizing Insurance Data in a Connected World
- Race to the Finish Line
- New Tools, New Opportunities in Claims
- ITA LIVE: Reaching Insurance Industry Crossroads
- Advice to Insurance IT Leaders: Keep Your Eye on the Ball
- New Date, Venue for ITA LIVE 2017
- Guidewire Makes Major Push to Small and Midtier Market by Acquiring ISCS
- Insurance Disruption is Happening Right Now
- Insurity Adds Strategic Investment Partner, General Atlantic
- Beyond Transformation: The Convergence of Finance, Risk, and Actuarial Functions
- The Rapid Evolution of Consumer Protection Regulation
- Talent Hunt: Finding, Attracting, Retaining Top People
- Insurers Flexing Their Distribution Models
- Technology Driving Disruption in Insurance
- Fear of ‘Next Bubble’ Challenges Life, Annuity Carriers
- Technology Allows Commercial Lines Insurers to Stand Out
- Single Sign-on Viewed as Biggest Tech Challenge for Agencies
- ISCS Observes 20th Anniversary; Scurto Predicts Major Changes Ahead
- Policyholders and Their First Impressions
- Progressive Making Progress on the UBI Front
- High and Dry: Insurers Search for Disaster Recovery Plans
- Insurers Sign The (Un)Dotted Line
- Reflections of a Retired Insurance CIO
- Mobile Device Management Just One Answer to BYOD Issue
- Lessons from GEICO and Progressive on Winning the Critical Buying Stage
- You Are a Target for a Cyber Attack
- Web-based Systems are the Next Evolution in Claims Technology
- Gaining a “Wow” Experience from Web Users
- Time to Shift from Business/IT Alignment to Business/IT Alliance
- Healthcare Insurers Changing to Consumer Model
- Organization is the Key for Selecting Software Vendors
- Analysts Expound on the Needs of the Mid-tier Insurance Market
- Finding the Cure for Obamacare’s Website
- New Software Solutions Benefit Insurers on the Inside and Outside
- Products, Market Impede Investment in Systems for Life Insurers
- Combatting Cyber Threats: Predict, Prevent, Persist
- The Future of Telematics Heads Beyond Insurance
- The Shame in Cyber Security Lapses
- Building Policy Administration Systems for the Future
- Insurers Look Into The Eyes of Their Policyholders
- It’s a New Dawn for the ITA
INSURANCE IT NEWS
- Crawford Technologies Announces Second Annual Customer Communications Virtual Summit
- Zywave Acquires Risk Management Solutions Provider Enquiron
- eMaxx Launches Customer Centric Platform for Variable Cost Captive Programs
- Brewer Lane Ventures Hires David Castellani, Former New York Life Executive and Head of Technology
- RW Exchange, Sterling Seacrest Pritchard Announce Partnership
- Protecht Hires Todd Hancock as Chief Insurance Officer
- IMS Signs Partnership with Car Sharing Marketplace Turo
- Erie Insurance to Upgrade Majesco Billing for P&C on Majesco CloudInsurer® and Implement Majesco Insurance Data and Analytics Platform
ELECTRONIC CHAT
The Email Chat is a regular feature of the ITA Pro magazine and website. We send a series of questions to an insurance IT leader in search of thought-provoking responses on important issues facing the insurance industry.
-
Electronic Chat with Robert Clark, CEO, Cloverleaf Analytics
Laura Mazzuca Toops
Leveraging his knowledge and skills of past successes in creating business intelligence solutions, Clark founded and launched Cloverleaf Analytics in... READ MORE
ITA LIVE 2020
ITA LIVE 2020 –SAVE THE DATE!
April 5th – 7th, 2020
The Diplomat Resort
Hollywood, FL
Become a member today to receive updates – www.itapro.org/MR
BLOGS AND COLUMNS
-
Solving Customer Communications Challenges with Hybrid Mail
Ernie Crawford
Even the most digitally transformed insurance organizations struggle with ad hoc customer communications. Luckily, technology can help... READ MORE
-
Why Data Science Fails
Bob Frady
Data science projects that “fail” all have one element in common... READ MORE
only online
-
Down Market Opportunities Beckon Benefits Insurers
You have surely heard it said that small businesses are the growth engine for America. Today, the phrase has a special ring to it for benefits... READ MORE
-
Technology at the Heart of Change in Insurance
With stagnant growth and lingering low interest rates, the life insurance industry faces a challenging future... READ MORE
-
Got Policies? IVANS Service Helps Feed Commercial Lines Producers
Finding insurance carriers willing to write commercial lines risks has always been a challenge for producers... READ MORE
-
Technology Changes Coming Faster than Ever for Insurers
As Guidewire Software prepares for the start of Connections, its 11th annual user conference that begins on Nov. 2, Brian Desmond, chief marketing... READ MORE
Vendor Views
-
COVID-19 One Year Later: The Digital Transformation of Insurance
COVID-19 has accelerated digital adoption, especially in the areas of claims adjustment and fraud prevention... READ MORE
- Vendor Views
Partner News
-
Big Data and Insurtech: A Carrier Perspective
Insurance has always relied on large volumes of data to gauge customer behavior and more. But as big data has gotten bigger, insurtech has empowered... READ MORE
- Partner News